'Malaysia should end manhunt for BD worker Kabir'


FE ONLINE REPORT | Published: July 21, 2020 21:23:44 | Updated: July 22, 2020 10:15:13


'Malaysia should end manhunt for BD worker Kabir'

Malaysia should end the manhunt for Bangladeshi migrant worker Kabir, end its attacks on media freedom, and stop mistreating migrants and harassing those who defend them, said Human Rights Watch (HRW).

The New York-based rights group on July 17 said those in a statement.

“A Bangladeshi migrant worker in Malaysia faces dire consequences for speaking out about the poor treatment of migrant workers in the country. Mohamed Rayhan Kabir spoke to Al Jazeera about Malaysia’s controversial roundup of undocumented migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic for a documentary entitled “Locked Up in Malaysia’s Lockdown”, said HRW.

Shortly after the documentary aired, Malaysian authorities announced they wanted to question Kabir, stated the HRW.

They splashed his name, photo, and address across the media, putting him at risk in an environment increasingly hostile towards migrants. A few days later, in what appears to be a clear act of retaliation for his critical comments, the inspector-general of police announced that the Immigration Department had revoked Kabir’s work permit, the HRW pointed out.

The government’s action sends a chilling message to the country’s many migrant workers: If you want to stay in Malaysia, don’t speak up no matter how badly you have been treated.

Immigration Director-General Khairul Dzaimee Daud made that point clearly.

In a July 6 statement, he warned that foreigners on long-term passes should “be careful” when making any statements or risk losing their work permits. He added that permit holders “will be required to leave the country immediately if the statement is inaccurate and aimed at damaging Malaysia’s image.”

Kabir is not the only one facing consequences for criticising the Malaysian government’s treatment of migrants. On July 10, police questioned six Al Jazeera staff as part of a police investigation into whether the documentary violated any laws, including sedition and criminal defamation laws and the Communications and Multimedia Act, frequently used to curb free speech, according to the statement.

sajibur@gmail.com

Share if you like